Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Ethics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Støre Brinchmann, B.
Right arrow Articles by Nortvedt, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Støre Brinchmann, B.
Right arrow Articles by Nortvedt, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

What Matters to the Parents? a qualitative study of parents’ experiences with life-and-death decisions concerning their premature infants

Berit Støre Brinchmann

University of Oslo, Norway, Berit.Stoere.Brinchmann{at}hibo.no

Reidun Førde

University of Oslo, Norway

Per Nortvedt

University of Oslo, Norway

The aim of this article is to generate knowledge about parents’ participation in life-and-death decisions concerning their very premature and/or critically ill infants in hospital neonatal units. The question is: what are parents’ attitudes towards their involvement in such decision making?

A descriptive study design using in-depth interviews was chosen. During the period 1997-2000, 20 qualitative interviews with 35 parents of 26 children were carried out. Ten of the infants died; 16 were alive at the time of the interview. The comparative method (grounded theory) was used to analyse the data. The analysis was carried out continuously and in parallel with data collection.

Six categories were revealed by the analysis: indecision and uncertainty (ambivalence); information and communication; participate, but do not decide; seeming to be included; the parents’ child; and individual consideration.

The findings appear to indicate that parents agree that they should not have the final word in decisions concerning their infants’ future life or death. Such a responsibility would put too heavy a burden on parents who lack the medical knowledge and the professional experience needed to make such a decision, and would be likely to lead to them experiencing strong feelings of guilt. The findings show that parents should be well informed and listened to during the whole decision-making process. Their primary concern was how nurses and physicians communicate with parents who are experiencing a crisis, and how this serious information is presented.

Key Words: critically ill premature infants • ethics of KE Løgstrup • life-and-death • parents’ decision making • Norway

Nursing Ethics, Vol. 9, No. 4, 388-404 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0969733002ne523oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
R. D. Boss, N. Hutton, P. K. Donohue, and R. M. Arnold
Neonatologist Training to Guide Family Decision Making for Critically Ill Infants
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 2009; 163(9): 783 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M A Schaufel, J E Nordrehaug, and K Malterud
"So you think I'll survive?": a qualitative study about doctor-patient dialogues preceding high-risk cardiac surgery or intervention
Heart, August 1, 2009; 95(15): 1245 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. A. E. Verhagen, M. de Vos, J. H. H. M. Dorscheidt, B. Engels, J. H. Hubben, and P. J. Sauer
Conflicts About End-of-Life Decisions in NICUs in the Netherlands
Pediatrics, July 1, 2009; 124(1): e112 - e119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
P Weisleder
Physicians as healthcare surrogate for terminally ill children
J. Med. Ethics, September 1, 2008; 34(9): e8 - e8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family NursingHome page
P. Hall, J. T. Sanford, and A. S. Demi
Patterns of Decision Making by Wives of Patients With LifeThreatening Cardiac Disease
Journal of Family Nursing, August 1, 2008; 14(3): 347 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
J Tripp and D McGregor
Withholding and withdrawing of life sustaining treatment in the newborn
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2006; 91(1): F67 - F71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. C. Partridge, A. M. Martinez, H. Nishida, N.-Y. Boo, K. W. Tan, C.-Y. Yeung, J.-H. Lu, and V. Y.H. Yu
International Comparison of Care for Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Parents' Perceptions of Counseling and Decision-Making
Pediatrics, August 1, 2005; 116(2): e263 - e271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
H. T. Keenan, M. W. Doron, and B. A. Seyda
Comparison of Mothers' and Counselors' Perceptions of Predelivery Counseling for Extremely Premature Infants
Pediatrics, July 1, 2005; 116(1): 104 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
I. Hallstrom and G. Elander
Decision Making in Paediatric Care: an overview with reference to nursing care
Nursing Ethics, May 1, 2005; 12(3): 223 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]