This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Horstman, K. Articles by van Rens-Leenaarts, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Horstman, K. Articles by van Rens-Leenaarts, E. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Beyond the Boundary Between Science and Values: re-evaluating the moral dimension of the nurse’s role in cot death prevention

University of Maastricht, The Netherlands, K.Horstman{at}ZW.unimaas.nl

Engeline van Rens-Leenaarts

University of Maastricht, The Netherlands

This article combines a philosophical critique of the idea that public health nurses are primary technicians who neutrally hand over scientifically established facts on risks to the public and an empirical analysis of the actual work of public health nurses. It is argued that the relationship between facts and values in public health is complex and that, despite the introduction of several scientifically-based standards and guidelines, public health nurses are not technicians. They do moral work and experience ethical dilemmas. To get a grip on the specific character of this moral work, we distance ourselves from the idea that there are ethical dilemmas in public health nursing for which we can provide general ethical rules and principles. Instead we suggest a contextual ethical approach, in which several different kinds of consideration may be important. To illustrate this, we analysed 15 in-depth interviews with nurses involved in the prevention of cot deaths in the Netherlands. It is shown that these nurses do not neutrally pass on the epidemiological facts on the risks of prone sleeping, warm bedclothes and passive smoking, but they are the moral architects of this preventive practice. It is also shown that this moral work and the ethical dilemmas they experience cannot be characterized in terms of general ethical rules and principles. It becomes clear that the moral work of nurses differs according to the three main risks at stake: the balance between virtue, risk taking and responsibility depends on the specific context.

Key Words: public health nursing • public health ethics • preventing cot death • risks

Nursing Ethics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 137-154 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0969733002ne494oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?