Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Ethics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuuppelomäki, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuuppelomäki, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Decision-Making Process when Starting Terminal Care as Assessed by Nursing Staff

Merja Kuuppelomäki

Research and Development, Centre for Social Welfare and Health, Seinäjoki Polytechnic, Koskenalantie 17, FIN-60220, Seinäjoki, Finland, stmkuu{at}seamk.fi

This article deals with making decisions about starting terminal care. The results are part of a larger survey on nurses’ conceptions of terminal care in community health centres in Finland. The importance, frequency and timing of decision making as well as communication and the number of investigations and procedures carried out are examined. The relationship between decision making and the size of a health centre’s catchment population is also discussed. The results make it possible to compare the current situation in Finland with the national law on patients’ rights. The sample consisted of 328 nurses who worked on the wards of 32 community health centres. The data were collected by means of a structured questionnaire and processed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software. The nurses agreed that explicit decision making and documentation about starting terminal care were necessary, but it was highlighted that the practice had many shortcomings. Decisions were often made too late and the patients were not always aware of their situation; family members and the nursing staff were mostly better informed. It was noted that many investigations and other procedures were carried out on terminally ill patients, often at the request of family members. Decision making was found to have some relationship to the size of a health centre’s catchment area.

Key Words: decision making • life-prolonging treatment • nursing staff • terminal care • terminally ill patient

Nursing Ethics, Vol. 9, No. 1, 20-35 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0969733002ne478oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
B. Wadensten, S. Wenneberg, M. Silen, Ping Fen Tang, and G. Ahlstrom
A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Nurses' Ethical Concerns
Nursing Ethics, November 1, 2008; 15(6): 745 - 760.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
M. Silen, M. Svantesson, and G. Ahlstrom
Nurses' Conceptions of Decision Making Concerning Life-Sustaining Treatment
Nursing Ethics, March 1, 2008; 15(2): 160 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
K. S Thacker
Nurses' Advocacy Behaviors in End-of-Life Nursing Care
Nursing Ethics, March 1, 2008; 15(2): 174 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
Z. R. Wolf and P. R. Zuzelo
"Never Again" Stories of Nurses: Dilemmas in Nursing Practice
Qual Health Res, November 1, 2006; 16(9): 1191 - 1206.
[Abstract] [PDF]