This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Woogara, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Woogara, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Patient Safety Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Human Rights and Patients’ Privacy in UK Hospitals

European Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Stag Hill, Guildford GU2 7TE, UK

The European Convention on Human Rights has been incorporated into UK domestic law. It gives many rights to patients within the National Health Service (NHS). This article explores the concept of patients’ right to privacy. It stresses that privacy is a basic human right, and that its respect by health professionals is vital for a patient’s physical, mental, emotional and spiritual well-being. I argue that health professionals can violate patients’ privacy in a variety of ways. For example: the right to enjoy their property; the right to protect their medical and personal information as confidential; the right to expect treatment with dignity during intimate care; and the right to control their personal space and territory. Some preliminary evidence indicates that many health care practitioners, including nurses, are presently unaware of the articles of the Convention and the implications of the Human Rights Act 1998. In order to prevent litigation for breaches of patients’ privacy, it is advocated that universities and other educational institutions, the Government and NHS trusts should help to produce a clear educational strategy and protocols so that students and practitioners are well informed in this field. Although 41 European countries are presently the signatories of the European Convention on Human Rights, including the UK, it is important to stress that the principles discussed in this article are applicable world-wide.

Key Words: European Convention on Human Rights • Human Rights Act 1998 • litigation • National Health Service • privacy

Nursing Ethics, Vol. 8, No. 3, 234-246 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/096973300100800308


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Heikkinen, G. J. Wickstrom, and H. Leino-Kilpi Privacy in occupational health practice: Promoting and impeding factors Scand J Public Health, March 1, 2007; 35(2): 116 - 124. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A Heikkinen, V Launis, P Wainwright, and H Leino-Kilpi Privacy and occupational health services. J. Med. Ethics, September 1, 2006; 32(9): 522 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Woogara Patients' Privacy of the Person and Human Rights Nursing Ethics, May 1, 2005; 12(3): 273 - 287. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. A Malcolm Does Privacy Matter? Former patients discuss their perceptions of privacy in shared hospital rooms Nursing Ethics, March 1, 2005; 12(2): 156 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Tschudin Editorial Nursing Ethics, July 1, 2004; 11(4): 331 - 331. [PDF]

				N. Tabak and M. Ozon The Influence of Nurses' Attitudes, Subjective Norms and Perceived Behavioral Control on Maintaining Patients' Privacy in a Hospital Setting Nursing Ethics, July 1, 2004; 11(4): 366 - 377. [Abstract] [PDF]