Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Ethics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sahlberg-Blom, E.
Right arrow Articles by Johansson, J.-E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sahlberg-Blom, E.
Right arrow Articles by Johansson, J.-E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Patient Participation in Decision Making at the End of Life as Seen by a Close Relative

Eva Sahlberg-Blom

Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden

Britt-Marie Ternestedt

Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden

Jan-Erik Johansson

Örebro Medical Centre Hospital, Örebro, Sweden

The aim of the present study was to describe variations in patient participation in decisions about care planning during the final phase of life for a group of gravely ill patients, and how the different actors’ manner of acting promotes or impedes patient participation. Thirty-seven qualitative research interviews were conducted with relatives of the patients. The patients’ participation in the decisions could be categorized into four variations: self-determination, co-determination, delegation and nonparticipation. The manner in which patients, relatives and caregivers acted differed in the respective variations; this seemed either to promote or to impede the patients’ opportunities of participating in the decision making. The possibility for participation seems to be context dependent and affected by many factors such as the dying patient’s personality, the social network, the availability of different forms of care, cultural values, and the extent to which nurses and other caregivers of the different forms of care can and want to support the wishes of the patients and relatives in the decision-making process.

Key Words: decision making • nursing ethics • qualitative method • terminal care

Nursing Ethics, Vol. 7, No. 4, 296-313 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/096973300000700404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
I. Lindstrom, F. Gaston-Johansson, and E. Danielson
Documentation of Patients' Participation in Care at the End of Life
Nursing Ethics, July 1, 2006; 13(4): 394 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
L.-L. Franklin, B.-M. Ternestedt, and L. Nordenfelt
Views on Dignity of Elderly Nursing Home Residents
Nursing Ethics, March 1, 2006; 13(2): 130 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
E. Ramfelt and K. Lutzen
Patients with Cancer: their approaches to participation in treatment plan decisions
Nursing Ethics, March 1, 2005; 12(2): 143 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
K. I Stajduhar and B. Davies
Variations in and factors influencing family members' decisions for palliative home care
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2005; 19(1): 21 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Gagnon, N. E. Mayo, J. Hanley, and N. MacDonald
Pattern of Care at the End of Life: Does Age Make a Difference in What Happens to Women With Breast Cancer?
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2004; 22(17): 3458 - 3465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
D. M. Gauthier and V. A. Swigart
The contextual nature of decision making near the end of life: Hospice patients' perspectives
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2003; 20(2): 121 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
M. E Cameron
Older Persons' Ethical Problems Involving Their Health
Nursing Ethics, September 1, 2002; 9(5): 537 - 556.
[Abstract] [PDF]