Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Ethics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lützén, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nordin, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lützén, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nordin, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Moral Sensitivity in Psychiatric Practice

Kim Lützén

Health Care Ethics, Ersta Institute of Health Care Ethics and Department of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institute, Sweden

Mats Evertzon

Stockholm University College of Health Sciences, Sweden

Conny Nordin

Department of Psychiatry, University of Linköping, Sweden

This study reports the results of a study of Swedish psychiatrists’ responses to moral statements related to decision making in the psychiatric context. Use was made of the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire, a modified instrument previously constructed from a theory of moral sensitivity. This Likert-type scale contains 30 items constructed from the following categories: interpersonal orientation, structuring moral meaning, benevolence, modifying autonomy, experiencing moral conflict, and trust in medical knowledge and principles of care. The purpose was to identify possible differences in responses rather than to evaluate right or wrong responses. The analysis is based on 754 completed questionnaires. The results of the study showed some significant differences in the item and category levels; for example, male psychiatrists experienced more conflicts than female psychiatrists and agreed to a greater extent that medical knowledge was most important in deciding what was best for the patient. The results also showed that more female than male psychiatrists thought that the relationship with the patient was most important in psychiatric practice.

Key Words: ethics • moral sensitivity • psychiatry

Nursing Ethics, Vol. 4, No. 6, 472-482 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/096973309700400604


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
K. Lutzen, V. Dahlqvist, S. Eriksson, and A. Norberg
Developing the Concept of Moral Sensitivity in Health Care Practice
Nursing Ethics, March 1, 2006; 13(2): 187 - 196.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
Y.-S. Kim, J.-W. Park, M.-A. You, Y.-S. Seo, and S.-S. Han
Sensitivity to Ethical Issues Confronted by Korean Hospital Staff Nurses
Nursing Ethics, November 1, 2005; 12(6): 595 - 605.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
C. Gastmans
A Fundamental Ethical Approach to Nursing: some proposals for ethics education
Nursing Ethics, September 1, 2002; 9(5): 494 - 507.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
K. Lutzen, A. Johansson, and G. Nordstrom
Moral Sensitivity: some differences between nurses and physicians
Nursing Ethics, November 1, 2000; 7(6): 520 - 530.
[Abstract] [PDF]