This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Monteverde, S. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Monteverde, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Importance of Time in Ethical Decision Making

Seminar am Bethesda, Fachstelle Ethik, Gellertstrasse 144, Postfach 4020 Basel, Switzerland, settimio.monteverde{at}bethesda.ch

Departing from a contemporary novel about a boy who is going to die from leukaemia, this article shows how the dimension of time can be seen as a morally relevant category that bridges both ‘dramatic’ issues, which constitute the dominant focus of bioethical decision making, and ‘undramatic’ issues, which characterize the lived experience of patients, relatives and health care workers. The moral task of comparing the various time dimensions of a given situation is explained as an act of ‘synchronizing’ the clocks. Ethical sensitivity and competence are presented as core skills that allow a continuity of care in situations where dramatic issues seem to be resolved, but undramatic ones are still not addressed. A nine-step model of shared decision making is proposed as an approach to identifying critical junctures within an illness trajectory and synchronizing the clocks of the involved actors.

Key Words: bone marrow transplant • ethical decision making • palliative care • time

Nursing Ethics, Vol. 16, No. 5, 613-624 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0969733009106653


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?