Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!
Nursing Ethics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Proot, I. M
Right arrow Articles by Crebolder, H. F J M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Proot, I. M
Right arrow Articles by Crebolder, H. F J M
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Supporting Stroke Patients’ Autonomy During Rehabilitation

Ireen M Proot

Institute for Bioethics, Maastricht, The Netherlands, i.proot{at}zw.unimaas.nl

Ruud H J ter Meulen

Institute for Bioethics, Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Huda Huijer Abu-Saad

Maastricht University, The Netherlands

Harry F J M Crebolder

Maastricht University, The Netherlands

In a qualitative study, 22 stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation in three nursing homes were interviewed about constraints on and improvements in their autonomy and about approaches of health professionals regarding autonomy. The data were analysed using grounded theory, with a particular focus on the process of regaining autonomy. An approach by the health professionals that was responsive to changes in the patients’ autonomy was found to be helpful for restoration of their autonomy. Two patterns in health professionals’ approach appeared to be facilitatory: (1) from full support on admission through moderate support and supervision, to reduced supervision at discharge; and (2) from paternalism on admission through partial paternalism (regarding treatment) to shared decision making at discharge. The approach experienced by the patients did not always match their desires regarding their autonomy. Support and supervision were reduced over time, but paternalism was often continued too long. Additionally, the patients experienced a lack of information. Tailoring interventions to patients’ progress in autonomy would stimulate their active participation in rehabilitation and in decision making, and would improve patients’ preparation for autonomous living after discharge.

Key Words: changing autonomy support • nursing homes • paternalism • shared decision making • supervision

Nursing Ethics, Vol. 14, No. 2, 229-241 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0969733007073705
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nurs EthicsHome page
M. Pajnkihar
Nurses' (Un)Partner-Like Relationships With Clients
Nursing Ethics, January 1, 2009; 16(1): 43 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]