This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dudzinski, D. M Articles by Shannon, S. E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dudzinski, D. M Articles by Shannon, S. E Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Competent Patients’ Refusal of Nursing Care

University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Sarah E Shannon

University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Competent patients’ refusals of nursing care do not yet have the legal or ethical standing of refusals of life-sustaining medical therapies such as mechanical ventilation or blood products. The case of a woman who refused turning and incontinence management owing to pain prompted us to examine these situations. We noted several special features: lack of paradigm cases, social taboo around unmanaged incontinence, the distinction between ordinary versus extraordinary care, and the moral distress experienced by nurses. We examined this case on the merits and limitations of five well-known ethical positions: pure autonomy, conscientious objection, paternalism, communitarianism, and feminism. We found each lacking and argue for a ‘negotiated reliance’ response where nurses and others tread as lightly as possible on the patient’s autonomy while negotiating a compromise, but are obligated to match the patient’s sacrifice by extending themselves beyond their usual professional practice.

Key Words: end-of-life care • ethics • nursing • obesity

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?