This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Svantesson, M. Articles by Ahlström, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Svantesson, M. Articles by Ahlström, G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Family Issues Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Nurses’ and Physicians’ Opinions on Aggressiveness of Treatment for General Ward Patients

Örebro University, and Örebro University Hospital,Ö rebro, Sweden, mia.svantesson{at}orebroll.se

Peter Sjökvist

Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (deceased)

Håkan Thorsén

Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden

Gerd Ahlström

Örebro University, and Örebro University Hospital,Ö rebro, Sweden

The aim of this study was to evaluate agreement between nurses’ and physicians’ opinions regarding aggressiveness of treatment and to investigate and compare the rationales on which their opinions were based. Structured interviews regarding 714 patients were performed on seven general wards of a university hospital. The data gathered were then subjected to qualitative and quantitative analyses. There was 86% agreement between nurses’ and physicians’ opinions regarding full or limited treatment when the answers given as ‘uncertain’ were excluded. Agreement was less (77%) for patients with a life expectancy of less than one year. Disagreements were not associated with professional status because the physicians considered limiting life-sustaining treatment as often as the nurses. A broad spectrum of rationales was given but the results focus mostly on those for full treatment. The nurses and the physicians had similar bases for their opinions. For the majority of the patients, medical rationales were used, but age and quality of life were also expressed as important determinants. When considering full treatment, nurses used quality-of-life rationales for significantly more patients than the physicians. Respect for patients’ wishes had a minor influence.

Key Words: attitudes • do not resuscitate • end-of-life decisions • ethics professionals • providing life-sustaining treatment • withholding life-sustaining treatment

Nursing Ethics, Vol. 13, No. 2, 147-162 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0969733006ne861oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M Svantesson, R Lofmark, H Thorsen, K Kallenberg, and G Ahlstrom Learning a way through ethical problems: Swedish nurses' and doctors' experiences from one model of ethics rounds J. Med. Ethics, May 1, 2008; 34(5): 399 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B.-M. Ternestedt Patients and their primary care providers identified 4 goals of life sustaining treatment Evid. Based Nurs., July 1, 2006; 9(3): 95 - 95. [Full Text] [PDF]