Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Ethics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malcolm, H. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malcolm, H. A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Does Privacy Matter? Former patients discuss their perceptions of privacy in shared hospital rooms

Helen A Malcolm

PO Box 6510, Dunedin North, Dunedin, New Zealand, helenmalcolm{at}clear.net.nz

As a relative concept, privacy is difficult to define in universal terms. In the New Zealand setting recent legislation aims to protect patients’ privacy but anecdotal evidence suggests that these policies are not well understood by some providers and recipients of health care. This qualitative study set out to identify some of the issues by exploring former patients’ perceptions of privacy in shared hospital rooms. The findings suggest a conditional acceptance of a loss of privacy in an environment dictated by architectural structure and by fiscal and time constraints. Participants indicated an awareness that personal information could be overheard and that their preference for a choice of setting for serious discussions was desirable. Some enjoyed the support offered in shared rooms, while, for others, overhearing another person’s health issues caused unnecessary distress. The participants suggested that knowing they could be overheard constrained information disclosure. This withholding of information has implications for health professionals’ ability to diagnose and treat patients appropriately.

Key Words: health professionals • patients • New Zealand • privacy • shared hospital rooms

Nursing Ethics, Vol. 12, No. 2, 156-166 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0969733005ne772oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
H. T. Mermelstein and J. J. Wallack
Confidentiality in the Age of HIPAA: A Challenge for Psychosomatic Medicine
Psychosomatics, April 1, 2008; 49(2): 97 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
A. Heikkinen, G. Wickstrom, and H. Leino-Kilpi
Understanding privacy in occupational health services.
Nursing Ethics, September 1, 2006; 13(5): 515 - 530.
[Abstract] [PDF]