Nursing Ethics

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuckett, A. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tuckett, A. G
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Nursing Ethics, Vol. 11, No. 5, 500-513 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0969733004ne728oa
© 2004 SAGE Publications

Truth-Telling in Clinical Practice and the Arguments for and Against: a review of the literature

Anthony G Tuckett

a.tuckett{at}mcauley.acu.edu.au

In general, most, but not necessarily all, patients want truthfulness about their health. Available evidence indicates that truth-telling practices and preferences are, to an extent, a cultural artefact. It is the case that practices among nurses and doctors have moved towards more honest and truthful disclosure to their patients. It is interesting that arguments both for and against truth-telling are established in terms of autonomy and physical and psychological harm. In the literature reviewed here, there is also the view that truth-telling is essential because it is an intrinsic good, while it is argued against on the grounds of the uncertainty principle. Based on this review, it is recommended that practitioners ought to ask patients and patients’ families what informational requirements are preferred, and research should continue into truth-telling in clinical practice, particularly to discover its very nature as a cultural artefact, and the other conditions and contexts in which truth-telling may not be preferred.

Key Words: arguments against • arguments for • clinical practice • truth-telling


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin EthicsHome page
P. A Berry
The withholding of truth when counselling relatives of the critically ill: a rational defence
Clin Ethics, March 1, 2008; 3(1): 42 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Trop DoctHome page
B. Hayes
Medical errors - a hospital in Nepal searches for answers
Trop Doct, January 1, 2008; 38(1): 45 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
C. Hird and C. Ustun
Letters to the Editor
Nursing Ethics, March 1, 2005; 12(2): 196 - 199.
[PDF]