Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Ethics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merrell, J.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Merrell, J.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Participant Observation and Informed Consent: Relationships and Tactical Decision-Making in Nursing Research

Joy Merrell

School of Nursing Studies, Coupland Building , Coupland Street, The University, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Anne Williams

School of Nursing Studies, University of Manchester, UK.

This paper draws on research undertaken by the authors in community well woman clinics and hospital settings. Discussion focuses on issues around informed consent and participant observation.

The authors are concerned to highlight the complexity of decision-making where researchers hold dual or multiple agendas, which are sometimes in conflict. Further situational factors which affect decision-making in research settings are explored. In particular, the complexity of gaining informed consent throughout the research process is addressed.

The intention is not to point to definitive resolutions to the problems posed, but rather to prompt debate about the often taken for granted meaning of 'informed' consent in relationship to participant observation.

Cet article est basé sur les recherches que les auteurs avaient entrepris dans des polycliniques de santé de femmes et des hôpitaux. La discussion est concentré sur les thèmes du consentement informé et l'observation participante.

Les auteurs sont inquiets de montrer la complexité du processus de se décider quant les chercheurs ont un rôle double ou multiple qui peut être en conflit. D'autres éléments qui influencent la prise de décisions dans des cadres de recherche sont aussi étudiés. En particulier, la compléxité de l'acquisition du consentement informé est adressée.

L'intention n'est pas d'amener à une résolution définitive du problème posé, mais plutôt d'inviter á une discussion sur le sens (trop souvent pris pour réalité) du consentment 'informé' quant il s'agit de l'observation participante.

Dieser Artikel stützt auf Forschungen, die die Autoren in Frauengesundheits-Kliniken und Spitälern unternommen hatten. Die Diskussion ist hier über die Themen Informierte Zustimmung und Mitteilende Beobachtung.

Die Autoren befassen sich mit der Vielschichtigkeit der Entscheidungskräfte wenn die Forscher doppelte oder mehrfache Rollen haben, die manchmal im Konflikt sein können. Andere Faktoren, die die Entscheidungsmöglichkeit beeinflussen, sind auch untersucht. Besonders wird hier die Komplexität des erhalten von informierter Zustimmungung während des Forschungsprozesses angesprochen.

Die Absicht ist nicht, eine definitive Lösung des Problems zu finden, sondern eher zu einer Debatte einzuladen über die zu oft als selbstverständlich betrachtete Bedeutung der 'informierten' Zustimmung auf der Ebene der mitteilenden Beobachtung.

Nursing Ethics, Vol. 1, No. 3, 163-172 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/096973309400100305


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
K. Kaiser
Protecting Respondent Confidentiality in Qualitative Research
Qual Health Res, November 1, 2009; 19(11): 1632 - 1641.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
P. Griffiths
Ethical conduct and the nurse ethnographer: consideration of an ethic of care
Journal of Research in Nursing, July 1, 2008; 13(4): 350 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
J. Hewitt
Ethical Components of Researcher Researched Relationships in Qualitative Interviewing
Qual Health Res, October 1, 2007; 17(8): 1149 - 1159.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
J. Seymour, S. Payne, D. Reid, A. Sargeant, J. Skilbeck, and P. Smith
Ethical and methodological issues in palliative care studies: The experiences of a research group
Journal of Research in Nursing, March 1, 2005; 10(2): 169 - 188.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
O. Parry and N. S. Mauthner
Whose Data are They Anyway?: Practical, Legal and Ethical Issues in Archiving Qualitative Research Data
Sociology, February 1, 2004; 38(1): 139 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
J. Lawton
Gaining and Maintaining Consent: Ethical Concerns Raised in a Study of Dying Patients
Qual Health Res, September 1, 2001; 11(5): 693 - 705.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
V. Tschudin
European Experiences of Ethics Committees
Nursing Ethics, March 1, 2001; 8(2): 142 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]